In America Murder is murder and different degrees of punishment are handed down based upon the motivation and execution of the crime by the perpetrator of said criminal act.

And a terrorist is defined as one who commits terrorist acts.
Doesn’t seem too precise a definition to me. Let me repeat it, “the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce” it goes on to say “especially for political purposes.” BUT NOT ALWAYS.
I knew it was only a matter of time before you would blame Bush for something that occurs “naturally in nature.”

At 3:06 PM I already knew what I needed to know to come to my “conclusion.” If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, its probably a duck. All you need is common sense.

Yes 10 days later I still know what I knew then. Especially when I found out he was a muslim, a SOA (soldier of Allah) as printed on his business cards.

My question is WHY? Why don’t you feel this is a terrorist act? McVeigh was a one man terrorist not backed by any nation or group. Just a dumb ass like this guy.

So convince me, please. I am not trying to be a smart ass or argumentative, I really want to know why the left is sweeping this under the rug.

‘Even without all that information, at 3:06PM when Sean Hannity came on the air he said that he thought this might be a terrorist act. I screamed at my radio, “Of course it is!!!!!”’

That is exactly the problem. Without any evidence or information at all you came to the conclusion that this was a terrorist act. Are you still confidant that it was in fact a terrorist act now, 5 days later?

“What I do know, is that after 9-11, George W. Bush did not allow it. He made it his mission to make sure that it did not happen.”

I’m assuming that by “did not allowed this” you mean that he did not allow thing like this to slip by with out calling it terrorism. The word “terrorism” became so loosely defined under the Bush administration that it could have applied to almost anyone who committed nearly any act of violence. It is good to call things like they are, but there is a middle ground. If you are too politically correct you will narrow definitions so much that they exclude nearly everything, and on the other end of the spectrum you have overly broad definition that tend to include nearly everything. Neither are useful.