<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Nation Under &#8220;Place idol here&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juniorychino.com/2009/09/16/one-nation-under-place-idol-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juniorychino.com/2009/09/16/one-nation-under-place-idol-here/</link>
	<description>Because we love America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:27:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: P</title>
		<link>http://www.juniorychino.com/2009/09/16/one-nation-under-place-idol-here/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juniorychino.com/?p=117#comment-176</guid>
		<description>I meant it exactly the way that you explained, and I am sure that you have heard the arguments before.  I for one am always open to hear an argument that dispels something I believe.  It has happened many times before, and is the reason my world view has changed over time.  I have hated the idea of communism/ socialism in the past…I have changed my mind and supported it…and now I dismantle it and choose what I like from it.  I have gone through the same transitions in regard to capitalism and religion.  I have learned to always read the literature of “the other side” no matter how convinced I am of something.  This is the only way to truly evaluate and understand the arguments.  I have Marxist friends…and trust me I argue with them a lot.  

There is no political or economic alliance in existence that is fully compatible with my analysis and evaluation of world history and current events.  I think I have said this before, but redistribution of wealth does not work unless everyone works (still then it has kinks).  Similar to the way capitalism does not work unless its inherent greed is curtailed.  That is why there has been so much regulation of the market up to today (Trustbusters, minimum wage, etc)…because it doesn’t work (not for the majority). My main problem with Marxism is that it is just a theory, and it is a violent one at that. There has to be a middle ground.  We just have not identified it.  This is why I cannot say that I believe in either.  I believe private property and the market can be good, but only if it serves the public good.  Once corporations are allowed to wreak havoc upon the poor and weak we have gone too far.   As far as Marxism, for it to work there cannot be an elite class as there was in Russia and many other places. We need a system based on developing communities so that everyone can have access to wealth; but not one like Marxism that believes in displacing and robbing the wealthy by declaring them the enemy.  Or, that murders people and violates the natural rights of mankind.  The system must be based on education and open dialogue so that people can see for themselves and enact change.

I guess you could say I am a humanitarian, first and foremost.  I believe in democracy.  As far as economics goes…. we need to explore new uncharted waters.  Can you really support Capitalism wholeheartedly knowing all of the horrible things it has brought in history?  It is a system based on the accumulation of wealth.  Is that the best economic theory humanity has to offer?  Therefore, it operates on a first come first serve basis:  The earlier you get in, the more you can accumulate.  However, if you are born at the bottom your chances are dismal.  We need a system based on developing communities so that everyone can have access to wealth. 

My political views can be summed up this way:  If a particular ideology or policy brings about harm to communities, places people in distress, or in any way brings about a destructive effect, it is wrong.  I will support any idea as long as it brings forth growth and development for all.  And that IS possible.  We just have to keep fine-tuning and remain open to ideas.  Don’t you agree that we should stop exporting American jobs?  Shouldn’t our people have full access to any employment we can produce?  The problem is that since our major corporations are only concerned with wealth, they seek slave-wage labor.  How do you dispel these truths?

As far as sports…. Let us go to the replay.  Let us micro-analyze it (history), and if the play is visible from all angles, then I’m sure we can agree on the decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant it exactly the way that you explained, and I am sure that you have heard the arguments before.  I for one am always open to hear an argument that dispels something I believe.  It has happened many times before, and is the reason my world view has changed over time.  I have hated the idea of communism/ socialism in the past…I have changed my mind and supported it…and now I dismantle it and choose what I like from it.  I have gone through the same transitions in regard to capitalism and religion.  I have learned to always read the literature of “the other side” no matter how convinced I am of something.  This is the only way to truly evaluate and understand the arguments.  I have Marxist friends…and trust me I argue with them a lot.  </p>
<p>There is no political or economic alliance in existence that is fully compatible with my analysis and evaluation of world history and current events.  I think I have said this before, but redistribution of wealth does not work unless everyone works (still then it has kinks).  Similar to the way capitalism does not work unless its inherent greed is curtailed.  That is why there has been so much regulation of the market up to today (Trustbusters, minimum wage, etc)…because it doesn’t work (not for the majority). My main problem with Marxism is that it is just a theory, and it is a violent one at that. There has to be a middle ground.  We just have not identified it.  This is why I cannot say that I believe in either.  I believe private property and the market can be good, but only if it serves the public good.  Once corporations are allowed to wreak havoc upon the poor and weak we have gone too far.   As far as Marxism, for it to work there cannot be an elite class as there was in Russia and many other places. We need a system based on developing communities so that everyone can have access to wealth; but not one like Marxism that believes in displacing and robbing the wealthy by declaring them the enemy.  Or, that murders people and violates the natural rights of mankind.  The system must be based on education and open dialogue so that people can see for themselves and enact change.</p>
<p>I guess you could say I am a humanitarian, first and foremost.  I believe in democracy.  As far as economics goes…. we need to explore new uncharted waters.  Can you really support Capitalism wholeheartedly knowing all of the horrible things it has brought in history?  It is a system based on the accumulation of wealth.  Is that the best economic theory humanity has to offer?  Therefore, it operates on a first come first serve basis:  The earlier you get in, the more you can accumulate.  However, if you are born at the bottom your chances are dismal.  We need a system based on developing communities so that everyone can have access to wealth. </p>
<p>My political views can be summed up this way:  If a particular ideology or policy brings about harm to communities, places people in distress, or in any way brings about a destructive effect, it is wrong.  I will support any idea as long as it brings forth growth and development for all.  And that IS possible.  We just have to keep fine-tuning and remain open to ideas.  Don’t you agree that we should stop exporting American jobs?  Shouldn’t our people have full access to any employment we can produce?  The problem is that since our major corporations are only concerned with wealth, they seek slave-wage labor.  How do you dispel these truths?</p>
<p>As far as sports…. Let us go to the replay.  Let us micro-analyze it (history), and if the play is visible from all angles, then I’m sure we can agree on the decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chino</title>
		<link>http://www.juniorychino.com/2009/09/16/one-nation-under-place-idol-here/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>chino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juniorychino.com/?p=117#comment-172</guid>
		<description>I cannot argue with anything you have said. 

Whoah.... what does that mean. I will say, it may be a little pride, but not in the way you think. It is not prejudice, because I do read, listen and try to comprehend what you and anybody is trying to get across. I don&#039;t automatically think that everything you say is crap. 

Its a lot of the old arguments, and those I&#039;ve heard time and again, so those have already been discredited (in my opinion). So, I do dismiss those as soon as I hear them. Only because I have heard them before and have already made up my mind on those. That&#039;s where the &quot;prejudice&quot; comes in. For example, I am extremely prejudiced against redistribution of wealth (not saying that you are proposing that, just an example of my bias), therefore any arguments for the benefits of it I immediately dismiss and yes, try to discredit.

The PRIDE comes in the notion that I am confident and secure and even devout in my beliefs and what I have learned. As you are. You know what you have read or heard and vetted. So you, and I, will not let anything or any argument dispel what you already know. 

Is that pride? IDK.

Do you watch baseball or football? Its funny, my brother is a super die-hard JETS fan and although I like the Jets and root for them, I watch them objectively. When there is a questionable call, like did the guy make the first down, or did he fumble or was he down, he will ALWAYS argue that his team should get the call. BUT, that is what HE sees and BELIEVES! He sees it that way, he is not lying and just trying to make a case for it, he believes that is what he saw. I am like, &quot;dude, he didn&#039;t make it.&quot; but there is no convincing him. 

My point is, You and I pretty much are on the same page as to how things occurred, (we saw the same thing) we are just diametrically opposed as to why they happened or what the solution is. 

I believe wholeheartedly in capitalism. I BELIEVE the solution will naturally come out of it. I do not believe that forcing people (legislating) to do things one way ever works.

pssssst... up above, that&#039;s me being crystal clear once again about where I stand. I am a Capitalist, unabashedly. If you are not, then what are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot argue with anything you have said. </p>
<p>Whoah&#8230;. what does that mean. I will say, it may be a little pride, but not in the way you think. It is not prejudice, because I do read, listen and try to comprehend what you and anybody is trying to get across. I don&#8217;t automatically think that everything you say is crap. </p>
<p>Its a lot of the old arguments, and those I&#8217;ve heard time and again, so those have already been discredited (in my opinion). So, I do dismiss those as soon as I hear them. Only because I have heard them before and have already made up my mind on those. That&#8217;s where the &#8220;prejudice&#8221; comes in. For example, I am extremely prejudiced against redistribution of wealth (not saying that you are proposing that, just an example of my bias), therefore any arguments for the benefits of it I immediately dismiss and yes, try to discredit.</p>
<p>The PRIDE comes in the notion that I am confident and secure and even devout in my beliefs and what I have learned. As you are. You know what you have read or heard and vetted. So you, and I, will not let anything or any argument dispel what you already know. </p>
<p>Is that pride? IDK.</p>
<p>Do you watch baseball or football? Its funny, my brother is a super die-hard JETS fan and although I like the Jets and root for them, I watch them objectively. When there is a questionable call, like did the guy make the first down, or did he fumble or was he down, he will ALWAYS argue that his team should get the call. BUT, that is what HE sees and BELIEVES! He sees it that way, he is not lying and just trying to make a case for it, he believes that is what he saw. I am like, &#8220;dude, he didn&#8217;t make it.&#8221; but there is no convincing him. </p>
<p>My point is, You and I pretty much are on the same page as to how things occurred, (we saw the same thing) we are just diametrically opposed as to why they happened or what the solution is. </p>
<p>I believe wholeheartedly in capitalism. I BELIEVE the solution will naturally come out of it. I do not believe that forcing people (legislating) to do things one way ever works.</p>
<p>pssssst&#8230; up above, that&#8217;s me being crystal clear once again about where I stand. I am a Capitalist, unabashedly. If you are not, then what are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p</title>
		<link>http://www.juniorychino.com/2009/09/16/one-nation-under-place-idol-here/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juniorychino.com/?p=117#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Well...every open minded individual I have shown these posts thinks the opposite.  
I do not HAVE to be referenced or placed into a category.
If you can not comprehend my points...well then it is either pride or prejudice.
I have put forth many ideas...few are socialist/communist.
I never claimed the U.S. to be a democracy...that would be uneducated (I&#039;ll take it with a grain of salt and not shoot back).
However, our republic, as all republics ARE based in democratic ideals.  Republics are just easier to control and give the illusion of democracy.  
Within the walls of our governmental buildings, amongst out elected representatives, it is believed that democracy is what takes place between them.
Again, you are too quick to try to disprove and discredit me.  I know that you know these things but this is why it is hard to get anywhere with you.
In our internet age it may actually be possible to vote on everything...but that idea is bad news to some.
The point is that capitalism is not what was infused into the constitution when &quot;private property&quot; was spoken about. 
The Mao stuff is a distraction.  The reality can be found in the documentary, Fall of the Republic available on You Tube.
Could you...would you post that so we can discuss it?
It IS anti-Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;every open minded individual I have shown these posts thinks the opposite.<br />
I do not HAVE to be referenced or placed into a category.<br />
If you can not comprehend my points&#8230;well then it is either pride or prejudice.<br />
I have put forth many ideas&#8230;few are socialist/communist.<br />
I never claimed the U.S. to be a democracy&#8230;that would be uneducated (I&#8217;ll take it with a grain of salt and not shoot back).<br />
However, our republic, as all republics ARE based in democratic ideals.  Republics are just easier to control and give the illusion of democracy.<br />
Within the walls of our governmental buildings, amongst out elected representatives, it is believed that democracy is what takes place between them.<br />
Again, you are too quick to try to disprove and discredit me.  I know that you know these things but this is why it is hard to get anywhere with you.<br />
In our internet age it may actually be possible to vote on everything&#8230;but that idea is bad news to some.<br />
The point is that capitalism is not what was infused into the constitution when &#8220;private property&#8221; was spoken about.<br />
The Mao stuff is a distraction.  The reality can be found in the documentary, Fall of the Republic available on You Tube.<br />
Could you&#8230;would you post that so we can discuss it?<br />
It IS anti-Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chino</title>
		<link>http://www.juniorychino.com/2009/09/16/one-nation-under-place-idol-here/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>chino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juniorychino.com/?p=117#comment-168</guid>
		<description>FIRST OF ALL, Pablo, there are many other topics to discuss. What is your opinion on them? This is old and tired. 

2. YOU ARE NOT CLEAR, well, you were finally a little clearer this time, but you always claim what you ARE NOT, but it is also a distortion because you claim to NOT be a communist/socialist, but every idea you put forth comes from the book of Marx!!! You never really claim a philosophy or belief that we can reference. Duh, you are for truth, justice and the American way..... (which brings me to ..)

3. How many times, and how many uneducated people do I have to correct!?!? THIS IS NOT, NOT, NOT a democracy!!! Our form of government in the United States is a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, &quot;...and to the REPUBLIC, for which it stands, one nation, UNDER GOD....&quot; We elect our leaders democratically, but we are not a democracy. If it were a true democracy every election would be strife with referendums with the people voting on every single issue out there, but alas, they are not. Our leaders make those decisions for us which make elections that much more important.

4. Comment on the MAO thing. If you make sense on SEVERAL topics, maybe you can win over some believers. You are 0-4 so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FIRST OF ALL, Pablo, there are many other topics to discuss. What is your opinion on them? This is old and tired. </p>
<p>2. YOU ARE NOT CLEAR, well, you were finally a little clearer this time, but you always claim what you ARE NOT, but it is also a distortion because you claim to NOT be a communist/socialist, but every idea you put forth comes from the book of Marx!!! You never really claim a philosophy or belief that we can reference. Duh, you are for truth, justice and the American way&#8230;.. (which brings me to ..)</p>
<p>3. How many times, and how many uneducated people do I have to correct!?!? THIS IS NOT, NOT, NOT a democracy!!! Our form of government in the United States is a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, &#8220;&#8230;and to the REPUBLIC, for which it stands, one nation, UNDER GOD&#8230;.&#8221; We elect our leaders democratically, but we are not a democracy. If it were a true democracy every election would be strife with referendums with the people voting on every single issue out there, but alas, they are not. Our leaders make those decisions for us which make elections that much more important.</p>
<p>4. Comment on the MAO thing. If you make sense on SEVERAL topics, maybe you can win over some believers. You are 0-4 so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://www.juniorychino.com/2009/09/16/one-nation-under-place-idol-here/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juniorychino.com/?p=117#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Sure. Your explanation makes sense.  
&quot;My&quot; theory isn&#039;t about me though, and in reality the theory that the world is ruled by individuals who withhold information and distort history, and current events has been developed throughout the ages by a LONG LIST OF HISTORIANS, AND OTHER ANALYSTS.  There is too much evidence for me to waste time trying to explain more.
I just don&#039;t avoid that evidence and knowledge, I incorporate it into my world understanding instead.  
I love America because to me it stands for democracy, that is, the people.  I know that greedy and cruel individuals are conducting this train.  I can see how these attributes are proliferated in the media.  
Many are trying to prevent &quot;the people&quot; from understanding the true nature of the state of the nation and the world. 
Their goal is to prevent altruistic, non-partisan, and knowledgeable people like myself from expanding the meaning of democracy and knowledge here. 
Lastly, I have made it very clear: I am no communist/socialist.  I believe that as humans we must take the good or positive attributes of civilization and apply them, while discarding the bad or negative.   
The true quest is democracy, knowledge and brotherhood.
Farewell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure. Your explanation makes sense.<br />
&#8220;My&#8221; theory isn&#8217;t about me though, and in reality the theory that the world is ruled by individuals who withhold information and distort history, and current events has been developed throughout the ages by a LONG LIST OF HISTORIANS, AND OTHER ANALYSTS.  There is too much evidence for me to waste time trying to explain more.<br />
I just don&#8217;t avoid that evidence and knowledge, I incorporate it into my world understanding instead.<br />
I love America because to me it stands for democracy, that is, the people.  I know that greedy and cruel individuals are conducting this train.  I can see how these attributes are proliferated in the media.<br />
Many are trying to prevent &#8220;the people&#8221; from understanding the true nature of the state of the nation and the world.<br />
Their goal is to prevent altruistic, non-partisan, and knowledgeable people like myself from expanding the meaning of democracy and knowledge here.<br />
Lastly, I have made it very clear: I am no communist/socialist.  I believe that as humans we must take the good or positive attributes of civilization and apply them, while discarding the bad or negative.<br />
The true quest is democracy, knowledge and brotherhood.<br />
Farewell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chino</title>
		<link>http://www.juniorychino.com/2009/09/16/one-nation-under-place-idol-here/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>chino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juniorychino.com/?p=117#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Pablo, please don&#039;t go..... You are not coherent, as Nick pointed out, no one knew what you were talking about.

About distortion.... You keep citing your conspiracy theory on how you are being censored, LOL, that makes me laugh. I WANT people to read how &quot;out there&quot; you are. It only strengthens my position.... but unfortunately, I must apologize, I cannot speak for Junior, but I have been dealing with some personal issues in my life and have neglected the website. That is why your comments were not read, and or approved for several days. 

And we love America because it does stand for Capitalism! That is what makes us great. I know commies like yourself wish it to stand for Mao &amp; Che, but that is who Junior and I are trying to prevent from taking this country off the rails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pablo, please don&#8217;t go&#8230;.. You are not coherent, as Nick pointed out, no one knew what you were talking about.</p>
<p>About distortion&#8230;. You keep citing your conspiracy theory on how you are being censored, LOL, that makes me laugh. I WANT people to read how &#8220;out there&#8221; you are. It only strengthens my position&#8230;. but unfortunately, I must apologize, I cannot speak for Junior, but I have been dealing with some personal issues in my life and have neglected the website. That is why your comments were not read, and or approved for several days. </p>
<p>And we love America because it does stand for Capitalism! That is what makes us great. I know commies like yourself wish it to stand for Mao &#038; Che, but that is who Junior and I are trying to prevent from taking this country off the rails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://www.juniorychino.com/2009/09/16/one-nation-under-place-idol-here/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juniorychino.com/?p=117#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Chino.  I have been very coherent.  Maybe you just don&#039;t get it, or it is too much all at once (the latter I can understand).  By distortion I mean exactly what Nick cited in his remarks as the problem with the arguments.  Everyone that I have shown the chains agrees that Nick did a very good job of &quot;tearing apart&quot; the argument here.  
I feel that it becomes distortion when one is not able to take a step back and question themselves, or even admit being wrong or just not looking at something a certain way.  So either you guys are extremely proud or very prejudiced against &quot;certain perspectives&quot;.  I for one think it is prejudice, and that is why my comments will not have to be checked for seven days when they are only a few lines long (And when in every instance they appear right away, and are gone just as quick.  I never happened to me when I started posting.  I guess I rang some bells.  However, though you my not believe it I wish you guys well and hope you can broaden your perspectives.  Good book: Naomi Klein, The Shock Doctrine: Disaster Capitalism.  Hope the title doesn&#039;t count it out for you.  Good Fortune to you and yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chino.  I have been very coherent.  Maybe you just don&#8217;t get it, or it is too much all at once (the latter I can understand).  By distortion I mean exactly what Nick cited in his remarks as the problem with the arguments.  Everyone that I have shown the chains agrees that Nick did a very good job of &#8220;tearing apart&#8221; the argument here.<br />
I feel that it becomes distortion when one is not able to take a step back and question themselves, or even admit being wrong or just not looking at something a certain way.  So either you guys are extremely proud or very prejudiced against &#8220;certain perspectives&#8221;.  I for one think it is prejudice, and that is why my comments will not have to be checked for seven days when they are only a few lines long (And when in every instance they appear right away, and are gone just as quick.  I never happened to me when I started posting.  I guess I rang some bells.  However, though you my not believe it I wish you guys well and hope you can broaden your perspectives.  Good book: Naomi Klein, The Shock Doctrine: Disaster Capitalism.  Hope the title doesn&#8217;t count it out for you.  Good Fortune to you and yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://www.juniorychino.com/2009/09/16/one-nation-under-place-idol-here/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juniorychino.com/?p=117#comment-148</guid>
		<description>No you dont know me. 
Funny, as soon as I responded to my remarks not &quot;being approved&quot;for several days, they were suddenly posted within the same day.
The meaning of my comment:
Either pride or prejudice is what has prevented Junior and Chino from taking into account certain data and/or picking at the smallest things to quarrel about.  I think the site should read : &quot;JunioryChino: because we love capitalism&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No you dont know me.<br />
Funny, as soon as I responded to my remarks not &#8220;being approved&#8221;for several days, they were suddenly posted within the same day.<br />
The meaning of my comment:<br />
Either pride or prejudice is what has prevented Junior and Chino from taking into account certain data and/or picking at the smallest things to quarrel about.  I think the site should read : &#8220;JunioryChino: because we love capitalism&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.juniorychino.com/2009/09/16/one-nation-under-place-idol-here/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juniorychino.com/?p=117#comment-147</guid>
		<description>&quot;Pride or Prejudice...or please explain.&quot;

1. you need to explain.  I don&#039;t think anyone knows what your talking about.

2. Regarding your comment being deleted:
your comments aren&#039;t being removed, you just don&#039;t see them right away because they need to be approved by the admins of this blog.  As you can see, they are now visible.

3. Do I know you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pride or Prejudice&#8230;or please explain.&#8221;</p>
<p>1. you need to explain.  I don&#8217;t think anyone knows what your talking about.</p>
<p>2. Regarding your comment being deleted:<br />
your comments aren&#8217;t being removed, you just don&#8217;t see them right away because they need to be approved by the admins of this blog.  As you can see, they are now visible.</p>
<p>3. Do I know you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chino</title>
		<link>http://www.juniorychino.com/2009/09/16/one-nation-under-place-idol-here/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>chino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juniorychino.com/?p=117#comment-146</guid>
		<description>distortion? like insisting that we erase your incoherent remarks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>distortion? like insisting that we erase your incoherent remarks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
